Three awards have been withdrawn from Cannes Lions 2025 over fabrication of case studies and concerns around their legitimacy.
In the weeks that have followed Cannes Festival of Creativity, the integrity of the awards has been questioned, and what was once widely accepted as being part and parcel of advertising awards, has now been exposed.
DM9's “Efficient way to pay” was the most notable withdrawal as it won the Grand Prix in the Creative Data Lions. The DDB agency was caught using AI to fabricate news coverage in the case study and misleading the jury.
Two other DM9 awards were withdrawn too, and the agency’s co-president and CCO Icaro Doria stepped down. Following the Cannes news, D&AD also removed two pencils from the shop.
However, DM9 was not alone, as other awards have also since been questioned.
While the industry has been rocked by the news, many have acknowledged that embellishment, exaggeration and fabrication within awards entries has been a common occurrence within adland.
Cannes Lions has since introduced new "integrity standards" to ban agencies that submit "wilfully false" campaigns.
This episode features Campaign UK editor Maisie McCabe, deputy editor Gemma Charles and creativity and culture editor Gurjit Degun, who discuss what has led to this behaviour, and what happens next for awards.
This episode was hosted by Campaign's tech editor, Lucy Shelley.
Further reading:
- Adland’s ‘New Year's’ resolution should be to revive its integrity at Cannes Lions
- LePub takes disciplinary action following scrutiny of Cannes Lion-winning campaign
- Havas Costa Rica’s Cannes Lions-winning ad, Lessons of Shame, needs lessons of legitimacy
- Havas and World Vision’s Lessons of Shame under scrutiny after Cannes Lions win
- Don’t hate the player, hate the game
- Cannes Lions rocked by controversies over AI, authenticity and licensing
- DM9 admits faults in case study for Grand Prix-winning work

